Tag Archives: book-review

Demons (1872) Part 1 Dostoevsky’s Demons is such a complex novel that it can be read many different ways.  This time reading it, I was struck by a similarity it shares with his previous masterpieces: Notes from Underground, Crime and Punishment, and The Idiot.  All of these books are preoccupied with the question, can peopleContinue reading

The Eternal Husband (1870) Velchaninov, the protagonist of Dostoevsky’s novel, The Eternal Husband, is haunted by his conscience.  A part of him knows that he has done wrong and has a longing to make it right.  Trusotsky, a man whom Velchaninov had cuckolded, suddenly reappears in Velchaninov’s life.   Velchaninov is a serial adulterer, andContinue reading

The Idiot (1868) In his novel, The Idiot, Fyodor Dostoevsky is interested in getting closer to reality, the ground beneath our feet.  But how do we get there?  The novel’s hero, Myshkin, says,  “I know about an actual murder over a watch, it’s in all the newspapers now.  If a writer had invented it, theContinue reading

Letters (1868-1871) When Dostoevsky was early in the process of writing the novel Demons, he told a friend that “I want to have my say, even if in the process my artistry should perish.”  This statement is striking because it reveals a battle within him.  He has convictions that he wants to air, yet whatContinue reading

Crime and Punishment (1866) Crime and Punishment is one of the most powerful reading experiences I’ve ever had. It hits me in a deeper way than most novels do. Why? I can’t answer that fully, but I think a factor that may be contributing to this soul-level experience has to do with the novel’s senseContinue reading

The Notebooks for Crime and Punishment (1866) Whenever I read an amazing finished work like Crime and Punishment, I often imagine that the book, in all it’s brilliance, just plopped into Dostoevsky’s head, ready made.  I was reassured to find in his working notebooks that this was not the case.  He took many of theContinue reading

The Gambler (1866) Whenever I read, I hunger for goodness.  If I start to suspect that the book doesn’t have any, I lose interest. But here’s the thing—goodness is difficult to write about.  Why?  It might be in the nature of how I taste goodness.  Take the goodness of pizza.  My experience of this goodnessContinue reading

Notes from Underground (1864) Part 2 When I first ingest the words of Notes from Underground’s narrator, the Underground Man, I think, “Wow, this guy is really eccentric.”  Then I keep reading, and I think, “Dostoevsky seems to be deliberately trying to make a personality that is as contradictory as possible—how can such a disjointedContinue reading

Notes from Underground (1864) Part 1 The Underground Man claims that his reason for writing down episodes from his life twenty years earlier is because “I am particularly oppressed by a certain memory from the distant past.  It came back to my mind vividly a few days ago, and since then, has remained with meContinue reading